Weekend Reading: Taylorism, Five Whys, Strategic Planning
From Perry Greenbaum:
Efficiency & The Cult of Taylorism
From HBR Blog:
The 5 Whys [Video]
Posts Tagged ‘ leadership ’
From Perry Greenbaum:Efficiency & The Cult of Taylorism
The 5 Whys [Video]
Quoted in Making Common Sense Common Practice: Models for Manufacturing Excellence:
According to an old story, a lord of ancient China once asked his physician, a member of a family of healers, which of them was the most skilled in the art. The physician, whose reputation was such that his name became synonymous with medical science in China, replied, “My eldest brother sees the spirit of sickness and removes it before it takes shape, so his name does not get out of the house. My elder brother cures sickness when it is still extremely minute, so his name does not get out of the neighborhood. As for me, I puncture veins, prescribe potions, and massage skin, so from time to time my name gets out and is heard among the lords.”
A Ming dynasty critic writes of this little tale of the physician: “What is essential for leaders, generals, and ministers in running countries and governing armies is no more than this.”
From Machinery Lubrication:Tips for Reaching Contamination Targets
The Basics of Synthetic Oil Technology
Strategies for Overcoming Resistance to Change
6 Steps to Update Your Lubrication Program
Role Playing: Preparing for Difficult Conversations and Situations
Thinking On Your Feet: Staying cool under pressure
Theory of Constraints: Strengthening Your “Weakest Link”
Swim Lane Diagrams: Mapping and Improving the Processes in Your Organization
Porter’s Value Chain: Understanding How Value is Created Within Organizations
Get Ready for Promotion: Showing what you can do
I haven’t linked to this guy yet, but a lot of his posts seem modeled after Marcus Aurelius: reminders to the self in the stoic tradition.
Book Review: The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People
I can’t think of a single book that has added so much to the lexicon of corporate jargon. Proactive. Synergize. Think win/win. Urgency vs. importance. Circle of influence. Creative cooperation. Personal mission statements.
I don’t know how many of these terms were invented by Stephen Covey, but it sure seems like that he popularized them. Their current familiarity indicates that this book, published 23 years ago and still in print, has stood the test of time.
Despite the fact that some people only know these ideas through parody—as evidenced by Scott Adams’ Dilbert book Seven Years of Highly Defective People and 7 Habits of Highly Defective People
(ironically out of print)—the book is actually pretty good.
I first read The Seven Habits in 2002, but I picked it up again recently to see what additional perspective 9 years of life might add to the content. I was pleased with most of it.
The seven habits referred to are:
The habits are organized in a specific order. The first three habits move an individual from dependence—a child-like existence of irresponsibility—to independence—an more adult state where you take can take care of yourself. Those habits are focused on private victory.
However, independence is not the end state of an effective individual. Interdependence—working with other people to mutual benefit—is the objective. The second three habits focus on public victories which improve interdependence.
The last habit nourishes body, mind, spirit, and relationships so that one does not burn out.
One of the key points in the book is that independence is a necessary intermediate step on the way to interdependence. One can not be an effective collaborator until they can provide for themselves.
The model of the seven habits looks something like this (my own rendition considering the limitations of my diagramming software):
The very first chapter, Inside-Out, describes the early 20th century rise of the personality theory of effectiveness and leadership over the character-based theory. According to personality theory, people behave certain ways at certain times, which leads to success. The older theory (quite old, actually) is that a person possesses character traits or follows principles that lead them to behave in a certain manner, which then results in success. The popularity of the personality theory resulted from its promise of “shortcuts” to success. It seems that business and management literature is starting to move back to character, or trait, theory, but personality techniques are still popular.
Covey describes this process in detail and eschews “techniques” in favor of principles.
So, what I initially found interesting about the model is that it puts the “techniques” (the habits) first.
However, these habits are mere manifestations of underlying principles. Based on this idea, I reformulated the seven habits model into a “principles” model:
The reformulated model works as follows:
This also makes is a little more obvious that the first three principles are about private victory, and the second three principles are about public victory. Finally, the linear path from dependence to independence to interdependence is clearly illustrated.
The bottom line is that the book is worth reading (or re-reading) for just about anyone. Although the last chapter delves a bit too deeply into new-agey mysticism for my taste, the content forms a sound basis for living, working, and developing relationships.
Quoted in chapter 8 of The Science of Success:
Doctors of [the 15th century] kept their secrets locked in languages their patients could not read. To attack this citadel demanded a willingness to defy the canons of respectability, to uproot oneself from the university community and from the guild. Such a venture required as much passion as knowledge, and more daring than prudence. To open the way, a man needed the knowledge of a professional and yet not be committed to the profession. He should be in the physician’s world but not of it.
Project Management Phases and Processes
Joshua Ehrlich: Developing Executive Presence
Scott Keller: Five Questions That Should Shape Any Change Program [this article may add valuable perspective to my post on downward innovation.]
All hail the spotless resume and the “well-rounded” job seeker? George Anders: Spotting the Great but Imperfect Resume
Daniel Gulati: Facebook is Making Us Miserable [Amusingly, the author assumes quitting FB as "unrealistic," but the very first comment is about quitting. I did this myself in 2011 and I don't see that I miss much.]
timmolderez: Adjustable drafting table with basic tools and materials
Random_Canadian: Pocket Lathe
Rod Reinholdt: How to Implement an Effective Chain-wear Monitoring Program
Jim Fitch: Justifying the Cost of Excluding a Gram of Dirt
Stephen Sumerlin: 6 Steps to Update Your Lubrication Program
Japanese Machine Tool Drilling a Square Hole [h/t Hackaday]
You Gotta Grind [The Wright Brothers demonstrate that breakthrough innovations are not always epiphanies. h/t Rooted in Prosperity]
Some time ago, I sat transfixed as an industrial operations leader explained to a large group of employees that they would no longer be provided with checklists and procedures. Going forward they would learn to be “entrepreneurial,” and do their jobs without such “authoritarian” tools.
This paradigm was confirmed by a machine operator who told me on another occasion that in their area, they did not use procedures to start equipment, while “over there” in another area, their brutally authoritarian supervisor made them turn in various check sheets.
Both areas had an issue that was overloading certain bearings, resulting in serious maintenance expense and downtime. When investigation brought to light the role of the equipment startup procedure in overloading the bearings, guess which area was better able to institutionalize the new knowledge?
The day that the operations leader spoke about entrepreneurship, I was transfixed because I had been communicating the opposite message to many of these employees for weeks!
In another interesting situation, a new procedure was developed for doing a dangerous task. The new procedure was clearly better for safety and for the equipment. Safety incidents had resulted from doing the procedure the old way. However, it did take longer to perform the task, and the task was generally performed under time pressure. Yet, the environment where the new procedure was introduced was one in which challenge was encouraged when new procedures were inferior.
What should an entrepreneurial employee have done when the new procedure was introduced and explained? Some employees embraced it. Others ignored it. There were no consequences for those who neither followed it nor challenged it.
Did the executive leadership have such situations in mind when they spoke of decision rights and innovation? I highly doubt it.
One fascinating development related to the movement to empower employees has been what I have termed “downward innovation.”
Typically, when leaders speak of innovation and entrepreneurship, they are referring to implementing employee ideas on completing tasks more effectively, with less waste and redundancy, and to higher standards of quality. As owners of the means of production, the theory goes, employees will be have a strong incentive to ensure their livelihood, often in the form of equipment, stays working.
Yet, newly “empowered” employees sometimes do the opposite. Rather than raise standards, they decide to lower them. Rather than taking extra time to do a job, they use their new authority to take shortcuts… and then resist change when new knowledge reveals better ways of producing.
None of this is to say that empowering employees with decision rights is the wrong thing to do. The question of how much authority to give an employee requires systems thinking, rather than right-wrong blanket decisions. Here are a series of questions to ask when considering shifting decision rights to employees:
What would you do to avoid Downward Innovation?
Attention mentors and mentees: how to maximize your mentoring investment (with hints on how to get mentored)
Finally! A breath of fresh air. Someone says what needs to be said about quoting Karl Marx
Unless you’re perfect, here’s how to job hunt with less than a full deck
Contrarian advice on giving praise and cheating
An innovative management idea for using social technology to staff projects
Reliability strategy considerations for hydraulic pumps
Fruit fly problems? Forget poison and electrocution! Try option A, option B, and 4 more options
From MindTools: The Eight Causes of Conflict